When Runtime.exec() won't Navigate yourself around pitfalls related to the Runtime.exec() method
Summary In this installment of Java Traps, Michael Daconta discusses one new pitfall and revisits another from his previous column. Originating in the java.lang package, the pitfall specifically involves problems with the Runtime.exec() method. Daconta also corrects an error from Pitfall 3 and offers a simpler solution. (2,500 words) By Michael C. Daconta
s part of the Java language, the java.lang package is implicitly imported into every Java program. This package's pitfalls surface often, affecting most programmers. This month, I'll discuss the traps lurking in the Runtime.exec() method.
Pitfall 4: When Runtime.exec() won't The class java.lang.Runtime features a static method called getRuntime(), which retrieves the current Java Runtime Environment. That is the only way to obtain a reference to the Runtime object. With that reference, you can run external programs by invoking the Runtime class's exec() method. Developers often call this method to launch a browser for displaying a help page in HTML.
There are four overloaded versions of the exec() command:
public Process exec(String command);
public Process exec(String [] cmdArray);
public Process exec(String command, String [] envp);
public Process exec(String [] cmdArray, String [] envp);
For each of these methods, a command -- and possibly a set of arguments -- is passed to an operating-system-specific function call. This subsequently creates an operating-system-specific process (a running program) with a reference to a Process class returned to the Java VM. The Process class is an abstract class, because a specific subclass of Process exists for each operating system.
You can pass three possible input parameters into these methods:
A single string that represents both the program to execute and any arguments to that program
An array of strings that separate the program from its arguments
An array of environment variables
Pass in the environment variables in the form name=value. If you use the version of exec() with a single string for both the program and its arguments, note that the string is parsed using white space as the delimiter via the StringTokenizer class.
Stumbling into an IllegalThreadStateException The first pitfall relating to Runtime.exec() is the IllegalThreadStateException. The prevalent first test of an API is to code its most obvious methods. For example, to execute a process that is external to the Java VM, we use the exec() method. To see the value that the external process returns, we use the exitValue() method on the Process class. In our first example, we will attempt to execute the Java compiler (javac.exe):
Listing 4.1 BadExecJavac.java
import java.util.*; import java.io.*;
public class BadExecJavac { public static void main(String args[]) { try { Runtime rt = Runtime.getRuntime(); Process proc = rt.exec("javac"); int exitVal = proc.exitValue(); System.out.println("Process exitValue: " + exitVal); } catch (Throwable t) { t.printStackTrace(); } } }
A run of BadExecJavac produces:
E:\classes\com\javaworld\jpitfalls\article2>java BadExecJavac java.lang.IllegalThreadStateException: process has not exited at java.lang.Win32Process.exitValue(Native Method) at BadExecJavac.main(BadExecJavac.java:13)
If an external process has not yet completed, the exitValue() method will throw an IllegalThreadStateException; that's why this program failed. While the documentation states this fact, why can't this method wait until it can give a valid answer?
A more thorough look at the methods available in the Process class reveals a waitFor() method that does precisely that. In fact, waitFor() also returns the exit value, which means that you would not use exitValue() and waitFor() in conjunction with each other, but rather would choose one or the other. The only possible time you would use exitValue() instead of waitFor() would be when you don't want your program to block waiting on an external process that may never complete. Instead of using the waitFor() method, I would prefer passing a boolean parameter called waitFor into the exitValue() method to determine whether or not the current thread should wait. A boolean would be more beneficial because exitValue() is a more appropriate name for this method, and it isn't necessary for two methods to perform the same function under different conditions. Such simple condition discrimination is the domain of an input parameter.
Therefore, to avoid this trap, either catch the IllegalThreadStateException or wait for the process to complete.
Now, let's fix the problem in Listing 4.1 and wait for the process to complete. In Listing 4.2, the program again attempts to execute javac.exe and then waits for the external process to complete:
Listing 4.2 BadExecJavac2.java
import java.util.*; import java.io.*;
public class BadExecJavac2 { public static void main(String args[]) { try { Runtime rt = Runtime.getRuntime(); Process proc = rt.exec("javac"); int exitVal = proc.waitFor(); System.out.println("Process exitValue: " + exitVal); } catch (Throwable t) { t.printStackTrace(); } } }
Unfortunately, a run of BadExecJavac2 produces no output. The program hangs and never completes. Why does the javac process never complete?
Why Runtime.exec() hangs The JDK's Javadoc documentation provides the answer to this question:
Because some native platforms only provide limited buffer size for standard input and output streams, failure to promptly write the input stream or read the output stream of the subprocess may cause the subprocess to block, and even deadlock.
Is this just a case of programmers not reading the documentation, as implied in the oft-quoted advice: read the fine manual (RTFM)? The answer is partially yes. In this case, reading the Javadoc would get you halfway there; it explains that you need to handle the streams to your external process, but it does not tell you how.
Another variable is at play here, as is evident by the large number of programmer questions and misconceptions concerning this API in the newsgroups: though Runtime.exec() and the Process APIs seem extremely simple, that simplicity is deceiving because the simple, or obvious, use of the API is prone to error. The lesson here for the API designer is to reserve simple APIs for simple operations. Operations prone to complexities and platform-specific dependencies should reflect the domain accurately. It is possible for an abstraction to be carried too far. The JConfig library provides an example of a more complete API to handle file and process operations (see Resources below for more information).
Now, let's follow the JDK documentation and handle the output of the javac process. When you run javac without any arguments, it produces a set of usage statements that describe how to run the program and the meaning of all the available program options. Knowing that this is going to the stderr stream, you can easily write a program to exhaust that stream before waiting for the process to exit. Listing 4.3 completes that task. While this approach will work, it is not a good general solution. Thus, Listing 4.3's program is named MediocreExecJavac; it provides only a mediocre solution. A better solution would empty both the standard error stream and the standard output stream. And the best solution would empty these streams simultaneously (I'll demonstrate that later).
Listing 4.3 MediocreExecJavac.java
import java.util.*; import java.io.*;
public class MediocreExecJavac { public static void main(String args[]) { try { Runtime rt = Runtime.getRuntime(); Process proc = rt.exec("javac"); InputStream stderr = proc.getErrorStream(); InputStreamReader isr = new InputStreamReader(stderr); BufferedReader br = new BufferedReader(isr); String line = null; System.out.println(""); while ( (line = br.readLine()) != null) System.out.println(line); System.out.println(""); int exitVal = proc.waitFor(); System.out.println("Process exitValue: " + exitVal); } catch (Throwable t) { t.printStackTrace(); } } }
where includes: -g Generate all debugging info -g:none Generate no debugging info -g:{lines,vars,source} Generate only some debugging info -O Optimize; may hinder debugging or enlarge class files -nowarn Generate no warnings -verbose Output messages about what the compiler is doing -deprecation Output source locations where deprecated APIs are used -classpath Specify where to find user class files -sourcepath Specify where to find input source files -bootclasspath Override location of bootstrap class files -extdirs Override location of installed extensions -d Specify where to place generated class files -encoding Specify character encoding used by source files -target Generate class files for specific VM version
Process exitValue: 2
So, MediocreExecJavac works and produces an exit value of 2. Normally, an exit value of 0 indicates success; any nonzero value indicates an error. The meaning of these exit values depends on the particular operating system. A Win32 error with a value of 2 is a "file not found" error. That makes sense, since javac expects us to follow the program with the source code file to compile.
Thus, to circumvent the second pitfall -- hanging forever in Runtime.exec() -- if the program you launch produces output or expects input, ensure that you process the input and output streams.
Assuming a command is an executable program Under the Windows operating system, many new programmers stumble upon Runtime.exec() when trying to use it for nonexecutable commands like dir and copy. Subsequently, they run into Runtime.exec()'s third pitfall. Listing 4.4 demonstrates exactly that:
Listing 4.4 BadExecWinDir.java
import java.util.*; import java.io.*;
public class BadExecWinDir { public static void main(String args[]) { try { Runtime rt = Runtime.getRuntime(); Process proc = rt.exec("dir"); InputStream stdin = proc.getInputStream(); InputStreamReader isr = new InputStreamReader(stdin); BufferedReader br = new BufferedReader(isr); String line = null; System.out.println(""); int exitVal = proc.waitFor(); System.out.println("Process exitValue: " + exitVal); } catch (Throwable t) { t.printStackTrace(); } } }
A run of BadExecWinDir produces:
E:\classes\com\javaworld\jpitfalls\article2>java BadExecWinDir java.io.IOException: CreateProcess: dir error=2 at java.lang.Win32Process.create(Native Method) at java.lang.Win32Process.(Unknown Source) at java.lang.Runtime.execInternal(Native Method) at java.lang.Runtime.exec(Unknown Source) at java.lang.Runtime.exec(Unknown Source) at java.lang.Runtime.exec(Unknown Source) at java.lang.Runtime.exec(Unknown Source) at BadExecWinDir.main(BadExecWinDir.java:12)
As stated earlier, the error value of 2 means "file not found," which, in this case, means that the executable named dir.exe could not be found. That's because the directory command is part of the Windows command interpreter and not a separate executable. To run the Windows command interpreter, execute either command.com or cmd.exe, depending on the Windows operating system you use. Listing 4.5 runs a copy of the Windows command interpreter and then executes the user-supplied command (e.g., dir).
Listing 4.5 GoodWindowsExec.java
import java.util.*; import java.io.*;
class StreamGobbler extends Thread { InputStream is; String type;
// any output? StreamGobbler outputGobbler = new StreamGobbler(proc.getInputStream(), "OUTPUT");
// kick them off errorGobbler.start(); outputGobbler.start();
// any error??? int exitVal = proc.waitFor(); System.out.println("ExitValue: " + exitVal); } catch (Throwable t) { t.printStackTrace(); } } }
Running GoodWindowsExec with the dir command generates:
E:\classes\com\javaworld\jpitfalls\article2>java GoodWindowsExec "dir *.java" Execing cmd.exe /C dir *.java OUTPUT> Volume in drive E has no label. OUTPUT> Volume Serial Number is 5C5F-0CC9 OUTPUT> OUTPUT> Directory of E:\classes\com\javaworld\jpitfalls\article2 OUTPUT> OUTPUT>10/23/00 09:01p 805 BadExecBrowser.java OUTPUT>10/22/00 09:35a 770 BadExecBrowser1.java OUTPUT>10/24/00 08:45p 488 BadExecJavac.java OUTPUT>10/24/00 08:46p 519 BadExecJavac2.java OUTPUT>10/24/00 09:13p 930 BadExecWinDir.java OUTPUT>10/22/00 09:21a 2,282 BadURLPost.java OUTPUT>10/22/00 09:20a 2,273 BadURLPost1.java ... (some output omitted for brevity) OUTPUT>10/12/00 09:29p 151 SuperFrame.java OUTPUT>10/24/00 09:23p 1,814 TestExec.java OUTPUT>10/09/00 05:47p 23,543 TestStringReplace.java OUTPUT>10/12/00 08:55p 228 TopLevel.java OUTPUT> 22 File(s) 46,661 bytes OUTPUT> 19,678,420,992 bytes free ExitValue: 0
Running GoodWindowsExec with any associated document type will launch the application associated with that document type. For example, to launch Microsoft Word to display a Word document (i.e., one with a .doc extension), type:
>java GoodWindowsExec "yourdoc.doc"
Notice that GoodWindowsExec uses the os.name system property to determine which Windows operating system you are running -- and thus determine the appropriate command interpreter. After executing the command interpreter, handle the standard error and standard input streams with the StreamGobbler class. StreamGobbler empties any stream passed into it in a separate thread. The class uses a simple String type to denote the stream it empties when it prints the line just read to the console.
Thus, to avoid the third pitfall related to Runtime.exec(), do not assume that a command is an executable program; know whether you are executing a standalone executable or an interpreted command. At the end of this section, I will demonstrate a simple command-line tool that will help you with that analysis.
It is important to note that the method used to obtain a process's output stream is called getInputStream(). The thing to remember is that the API sees things from the perspective of the Java program and not the external process. Therefore, the external program's output is the Java program's input. And that logic carries over to the external program's input stream, which is an output stream to the Java program.
Runtime.exec() is not a command line One final pitfall to cover with Runtime.exec() is mistakenly assuming that exec() accepts any String that your command line (or shell) accepts. Runtime.exec() is much more limited and not cross-platform. This pitfall is caused by users attempting to use the exec() method to accept a single String as a command line would. The confusion may be due to the fact that command is the parameter name for the exec() method. Thus, the programmer incorrectly associates the parameter command with anything that he or she can type on a command line, instead of associating it with a single program and its arguments. In listing 4.6 below, a user tries to execute a command and redirect its output in one call to exec():
Listing 4.6 BadWinRedirect.java
import java.util.*; import java.io.*;
// StreamGobbler omitted for brevity
public class BadWinRedirect { public static void main(String args[]) { try { Runtime rt = Runtime.getRuntime(); Process proc = rt.exec("java jecho 'Hello World' > test.txt"); // any error message? StreamGobbler errorGobbler = new StreamGobbler(proc.getErrorStream(), "ERROR");
// any output? StreamGobbler outputGobbler = new StreamGobbler(proc.getInputStream(), "OUTPUT");
// kick them off errorGobbler.start(); outputGobbler.start();
// any error??? int exitVal = proc.waitFor(); System.out.println("ExitValue: " + exitVal); } catch (Throwable t) { t.printStackTrace(); } } }
The program BadWinRedirect attempted to redirect the output of an echo program's simple Java version into the file test.txt. However, we find that the file test.txt does not exist. The jecho program simply takes its command-line arguments and writes them to the standard output stream. (You will find the source for jecho in the source code available for download in Resources.) In Listing 4.6, the user assumed that you could redirect standard output into a file just as you could on a DOS command line. Nevertheless, you do not redirect the output through this approach. The incorrect assumption here is that the exec() method acts like a shell interpreter; it does not. Instead, exec() executes a single executable (a program or script). If you want to process the stream to either redirect it or pipe it into another program, you must do so programmatically, using the java.io package. Listing 4.7 properly redirects the standard output stream of the jecho process into a file.
After running GoodWinRedirect, test.txt does exist. The solution to the pitfall was to simply control the redirection by handling the external process's standard output stream separately from the Runtime.exec() method. We create a separate OutputStream, read in the filename to which we redirect the output, open the file, and write the output that we receive from the spawned process's standard output to the file. Listing 4.7 completes that task by adding a new constructor to our StreamGobbler class. The new constructor takes three arguments: the input stream to gobble, the type String that labels the stream we are gobbling, and the output stream to which we redirect the input. This new version of StreamGobbler does not break any of the code in which it was previously used, as we have not changed the existing public API -- we only extended it.
Since the argument to Runtime.exec() is dependent on the operating system, the proper commands to use will vary from one OS to another. So, before finalizing arguments to Runtime.exec() and writing the code, quickly test the arguments. Listing 4.8 is a simple command-line utility that allows you to do just that.
Here's a useful exercise: try to modify TestExec to redirect the standard input or standard output to a file. When executing the javac compiler on Windows 95 or Windows 98, that would solve the problem of error messages scrolling off the top of the limited command-line buffer.
Listing 4.8 TestExec.java
import java.util.*; import java.io.*;
// class StreamGobbler omitted for brevity
public class TestExec { public static void main(String args[]) { if (args.length < 1) { System.out.println("USAGE: java TestExec \"cmd\""); System.exit(1); }
// any error message? StreamGobbler errorGobbler = new StreamGobbler(proc.getErrorStream(), "ERR");
// any output? StreamGobbler outputGobbler = new StreamGobbler(proc.getInputStream(), "OUT");
// kick them off errorGobbler.start(); outputGobbler.start();
// any error??? int exitVal = proc.waitFor(); System.out.println("ExitValue: " + exitVal); } catch (Throwable t) { t.printStackTrace(); } } }
Running TestExec to launch the Netscape browser and load the Java help documentation produces:
E:\classes\com\javaworld\jpitfalls\article2>java TestExec "e:\java\docs\index.html" java.io.IOException: CreateProcess: e:\java\docs\index.html error=193 at java.lang.Win32Process.create(Native Method) at java.lang.Win32Process.(Unknown Source) at java.lang.Runtime.execInternal(Native Method) at java.lang.Runtime.exec(Unknown Source) at java.lang.Runtime.exec(Unknown Source) at java.lang.Runtime.exec(Unknown Source) at java.lang.Runtime.exec(Unknown Source) at TestExec.main(TestExec.java:45)
Our first test failed with an error of 193. The Win32 error for value 193 is "not a valid Win32 application." This error tells us that no path to an associated application (e.g., Netscape) exists, and that the process cannot run an HTML file without an associated application.
Therefore, we try the test again, this time giving it a full path to Netscape. (Alternately, we could add Netscape to our PATH environment variable.) A second run of TestExec produces:
This worked! The Netscape browser launches, and it then loads the Java help documentation.
One additional improvement to TestExec would include a command-line switch to accept input from standard input. You would then use the Process.getOutputStream() method to pass the input to the spawned external program.
To sum up, follow these rules of thumb to avoid the pitfalls in Runtime.exec():
You cannot obtain an exit status from an external process until it has exited
You must immediately handle the input, output, and error streams from your spawned external process
You must use Runtime.exec() to execute programs
You cannot use Runtime.exec() like a command line
Correction to Pitfall 3 In the discussion of Pitfall 3 ("Don't mix floats and doubles when generating text or XML messages") in my last column, I incorrectly stated that the different string representation of a decimal number after casting it from a float to a double was a bug. While this is a pitfall, its cause is not a bug, but the fact that the decimal numbers in question -- 100.28 and 91.09 -- do not represent precisely in binary. I'd like to thank Thomas Okken and the others who straightened me out. If you enjoy discussing the finer points of numerical methods, you can email Thomas.
The combination of forgetting my numerical methods class, the numerous bug reports on the bug parade, and the automatic rounding of floats and doubles when printing (but not after casting a float to a double) threw me. I apologize for confusing anyone who read the article, especially to new Java programmers. I present two better solutions to the problem:
The first possible solution is to always specify the desired rounding explicitly with NumberFormat. In my case, I use the float and double to represent dollars and cents; therefore, I need only two significant digits. Listing C3.1 demonstrates how to use the NumberFormat class to specify a maximum of two fraction digits.
Listing C3.1 FormatNumbers.java
import java.text.*;
public class FormatNumbers { public static void main(String [] args) { try { NumberFormat fmt = NumberFormat.getInstance(); fmt.setMaximumFractionDigits(2); float f = 100.28f; System.out.println("As a float : " + f); double d = f; System.out.println("Cast to a double : " + d); System.out.println("Using NumberFormat: " + fmt.format(d)); } catch (Throwable t) { t.printStackTrace(); } } }
When we run the FormatNumbers program, it produces:
E:\classes\com\javaworld\jpitfalls\article2>java FormatNumbers As a float : 100.28 Cast to a double : 100.27999877929688 Using NumberFormat: 100.28
As you can see -- regardless of whether we cast the float to a double -- when we specify the number of digits we want, it properly rounds to that precision -- even if the number is infinitely repeating in binary. To circumvent this pitfall, control the formatting of your doubles and floats when converting to a String.
A second, simpler solution would be to not use a float to represent cents. Integers (number of pennies) can represent cents, with a legal range of 0 to 99. You can check the range in the mutator method.
Next time In my next column, I'll present another pitfall from java.lang, as well as two traps hiding in the java.net and the Swing packages. If you know of any Java pitfalls that have wasted your time and caused you frustration, please email them to me so we can save others the same fate.
About the author Michael C. Daconta is the director of Web and technology services for McDonald Bradley, where he conducts training seminars and develops advanced systems with Java, JavaScript, and XML. Over the past 15 years, Daconta has held every major development position, including chief scientist, technical director, chief developer, team leader, systems analyst, and programmer. He is a Sun-certified Java programmer and coauthor of Java Pitfalls (John Wiley & Sons, 2000), Java 2 and JavaScript for C and C++ Programmers (John Wiley & Sons, 1999), and XML Development with Java 2 (Sams Publishing, 2000). In addition, he is the author of C++ Pointers and Dynamic Memory
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home